Q15.The size of the cabinet should be as big as governmental work justifies and as big as the Prime Minister can manage as a team. How far is the efficacy of a government then inversely related to the size of the cabinet? Discuss.

The efficacy of a government is often debated in relation to its cabinet size, a balance between manageability and comprehensive governance.

Inverse Relation: Arguments for Smaller Cabinet

The 91st Amendment Act (2003) limited cabinet size to 15% of Lok Sabha strength, reflecting concerns. Smaller cabinets generally ensure better coordination, quicker decision-making, clearer accountability, and reduced public expenditure.

Justification by Work: Arguments for Larger Cabinet

Conversely, a larger cabinet can facilitate wider representation (regional, social), allow for specialized portfolios, and leverage a broader talent pool for diverse governmental work.

PM's Role and Broader Efficacy Factors

Governmental efficacy hinges significantly on the Prime Minister's leadership, management skills, and ability to foster teamwork. It also depends on the quality of ministers and effective coordination mechanisms, not solely cabinet size.

Thus, the relationship is not purely inverse. An optimal cabinet size balances efficiency, representation, and effective governance for national development.