GS 2 · 2018Indian Polity15 Marks

Q5.Multiplicity of various commissions for the vulnerable sections of the society leads to problems of overlapping jurisdiction and duplication of functions. Is it better to merge all commissions into an umbrella Human Rights Commission? Argue your case.

Directive: Argue your case15 marks

Introduction

Multiplicity of commissions for vulnerable sections (NHRC, NCSC, NCST, NCW, NCPCR) often results in overlapping jurisdictions and duplication. This raises the question: would merging them into an umbrella Human Rights Commission be more effective?

Arguments for and Against Merger

Arguments for Merging Commissions
  • Improved efficiency and resource utilization via consolidated administration.
  • Holistic human rights approach, addressing issues without sectoral divisions.
  • Stronger advocacy and enhanced visibility with a unified human rights voice.
  • Streamlined grievance redressal for citizens, reducing confusion.
Arguments Against Merger
  • Loss of specialized focus and expertise crucial for specific vulnerable groups.
  • Reduced accessibility for marginalized communities, finding a general body less approachable.
  • Potential dilution of specific mandates and issues unique to each vulnerable section.
  • Increased bureaucratic burden and risk of generalisation over specific problems.
Constitutional and Statutory Basis

Many commissions derive authority from specific constitutional provisions (e.g., NCSC, NCST) or statutory enactments (e.g., NHRC, NCW, NCPCR). A blanket merger would thus necessitate complex constitutional amendments and legislative changes.

Way Forward

  • Strengthen inter-commission coordination and promote joint meetings.
  • Clearly delineate mandates and jurisdictions to avoid overlaps.
  • Empower existing commissions with greater resources and enforcement powers.
  • Promote joint investigations and reports on common issues.
  • Establish a central coordinating body to facilitate synergy.

Conclusion

While an umbrella Human Rights Commission offers administrative advantages, it risks undermining the specialized attention critical for diverse vulnerable groups. A pragmatic approach involves enhancing coordination, clarifying roles, and empowering existing specialized bodies, ensuring both efficiency and effective protection.

233 words · target ~250