Q5.Suppose one of your close friends, who is also aspiring for civil services, comes to you for discussing some of the issues related to ethical conduct in public service. He raises the following points:- (i)In the present times, when unethical environment is quite prevalent, individual attempts to stick to ethical principles may cause a lot of problems in one’s career. It may cause hardship to the family members as well as risk to one’s life. Why should we not be pragmatic and follow the path of least resistance, and be happy with doing whatever good we can? (ii) When so many people are adopting wrong means and are grossly harming the system, what difference would it make if only a small minority tries to be ethical? They are going t be rather ineffective and are bound to get frustrated. (iii) If we become fussy about ethical considerations, will it not hamper the economic progress of our country? After all in the present age of high competition we cannot afford to be left behind in the race of development (iv) It is understandable that we should not get involved in grossly unethical practices, but giving and accepting small gratifications and doing small favours increases everybody’s motivation. It also makes the system more efficient. What is wrong in adopting such practices? Critically analyze the above viewpoints. On the basis of this analysis, what will be your advice to your friend?

Your concerns about ethical conduct in public service are valid and reflect a common dilemma. Navigating an environment where unethical practices are prevalent requires clarity on one's foundational principles.

Ethical Conduct Amidst Systemic Pressure

• Acknowledges real risks to career and family, suggesting pragmatism and the path of least resistance.
• Critique: Compromising ethics erodes personal integrity and public trust. While challenging, upholding values ensures sustainable governance and true job satisfaction. Civil servants have a moral obligation to serve the public good, even at personal cost.

The Power of Minority Ethical Action

• Argues minority efforts are ineffective, leading to frustration against widespread corruption.
• Critique: Individual ethical actions create a ripple effect, inspiring others and fostering systemic change. They provide a moral compass, demonstrate alternatives, and are crucial catalysts for broader reform, countering apathy.

Ethics as a Catalyst for Economic Progress

• Suggests strict ethics hamper economic progress in a competitive age, implying expediency is necessary.
• Critique: Ethical governance (transparency, accountability) attracts legitimate investment, reduces corruption-related costs, and ensures efficient resource allocation. It fosters sustainable, long-term economic growth, proving ethics is an enabler, not a hindrance, to genuine development.

The Illusion of Small Gratifications

• Claims small gratifications and favours increase motivation and system efficiency.
• Critique: These acts erode public trust, normalize corruption, and undermine meritocracy. They distort decision-making, lead to systemic inefficiency, and set precedents for larger demands. True motivation stems from duty, not illicit incentives.

Uphold foundational ethical values with courage and resilience. Your integrity is paramount. Seek support from like-minded colleagues and focus on your sphere of influence to bring positive change. Be a role model; public service demands unwavering commitment to the greater good, even if it entails personal sacrifice.